Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 19:52 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:01:51 +0900, > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > > > At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > [1 ] > > > [1.1 ] > > > This is the combined patch for 3.2.53-rc1 relative to 3.2.52. > > >

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-28 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:01:51 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > [1.1 ] > > This is the combined patch for 3.2.53-rc1 relative to 3.2.52. > > This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. > > - Build Machine:

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-28 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:01:51 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [1 multipart/mixed (7bit)] [1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)] This is the combined patch for 3.2.53-rc1 relative to 3.2.52. This kernel can be built and

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 19:52 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: At Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:01:51 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [1 multipart/mixed (7bit)] [1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)] This is the combined patch for

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > This is the combined patch for 3.2.53-rc1 relative to 3.2.52. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. - Build Machine: debian jessy x86_64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 20:41 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:44:29 +, > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. > > There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:44:29 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. > There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:44:29 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 20:41 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: At Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:44:29 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-27 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:45:04 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [1 multipart/mixed (7bit)] [1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)] This is the combined patch for 3.2.53-rc1 relative to 3.2.52. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. - Build Machine: debian jessy x86_64 CPU:

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 08:39:20AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/25/2013 05:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. > >There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > >to this one. If anyone has any issues

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/25/2013 05:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/25/2013 05:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made

Re: [PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 08:39:20AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 11/25/2013 05:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with

[PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed Nov 27 13:44:29 UTC 2013. Anything

[PATCH 3.2 00/87] 3.2.53-rc1 review

2013-11-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.53 release. There are 87 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Wed Nov 27 13:44:29 UTC 2013. Anything