Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 18:09 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into > really old stable kernels.

Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 18:09 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into really old stable kernels. OK,

Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-03 Thread Dave Chinner
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into really old stable kernels. This was part of a much larger series of bug fixes that were

Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-03 Thread Dave Chinner
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into really old stable kernels. This was part of a much larger series of bug fixes that were

[PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Dave Chinner commit 22e757a49cf010703fcb9c9b4ef793248c39b0c2 upstream. generic/263 is failing fsx at this point with a page spanning EOF that cannot be invalidated. The operations are: 1190

[PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

2014-11-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Dave Chinner dchin...@redhat.com commit 22e757a49cf010703fcb9c9b4ef793248c39b0c2 upstream. generic/263 is failing fsx at this point with a page spanning EOF that cannot be invalidated. The