On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:16 +, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
>
> John reported a regression with this commit [1]. A fix seems to be
> already
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:16 +, Luis Henriques wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
John reported a regression with this commit [1]. A fix seems to be
already available, but
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
John reported a regression with this commit [1]. A fix seems to be
already available, but since it hasn't been accepted into mainline yet
I haven't
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:46:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
John reported a regression with this commit [1]. A fix seems to be
already available, but since it hasn't been accepted into mainline yet
I haven't picked
3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sasha Levin
commit 5e5aeb4367b450a28f447f6d5ab57d8f2ab16a5f upstream.
Verify that the frequency value from userspace is valid and makes sense.
Unverified values can cause overflows later on.
3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com
commit 5e5aeb4367b450a28f447f6d5ab57d8f2ab16a5f upstream.
Verify that the frequency value from userspace is valid and makes sense.
Unverified values can
6 matches
Mail list logo