On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:13:12AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:23 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > 3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Ben Hutchings
> [...]
>
> Should be
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:13:12AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:23 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
[...]
Should be
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:23 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> 3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
>
> --
>
> From: Ben Hutchings
[...]
Should be From: Dan Williams
I think you must have got my name by applying the 3.2 review
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:23 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
[...]
Should be From: Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
I think you must have got my
3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings
commit da87ca4d4ca101f177fffd84f1f0a5e4c0343557 upstream.
Since commit 77873803363c "net_dma: mark broken" we no longer pin dma
engines active for the
3.5.7.33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
commit da87ca4d4ca101f177fffd84f1f0a5e4c0343557 upstream.
Since commit 77873803363c net_dma: mark broken we no longer pin dma
engines active for the
6 matches
Mail list logo