On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:27 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
>>> pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
>>>
>>> Since the pci_dev is no
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:11 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
>> pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
>>
>> Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
>>
On 2012-07-19 11:27, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit.
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
the
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
the
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit.
On 2012-07-19 11:27, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:11 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 3:27 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
the detach. If the pci_dev is non NULL it's a PCI
Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
the detach. If the pci_dev is non NULL it's a PCI
12 matches
Mail list logo
