On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:23:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
> Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
> > and free_bootmem require physical address.
> > Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:10:27PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
> > and free_bootmem require physical address.
> > Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
> and free_bootmem require physical address.
> Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
>
> There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
> and free_bootmem require physical address.
> Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
>
> There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with
Hi, Andrew.
2012/11/13 Andrew Morton :
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
> Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
>> and free_bootmem require physical address.
>> Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
>>
>> There
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
> and free_bootmem require physical address.
> Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
>
> There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with virtual address.
So fix them.
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Benjamin
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with virtual address.
So fix them.
Cc: Andrew Morton
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
There are some call sites for free_bootmem()
Hi, Andrew.
2012/11/13 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be physical address.
There are some call sites for free_bootmem() with
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:10:27PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should be
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:23:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:31:55 +0900
Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
It is somehow strange that alloc_bootmem return virtual address
and free_bootmem require physical address.
Anyway, free_bootmem()'s first parameter should
14 matches
Mail list logo
