Re: [PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

On Thu 26-11-15 04:24:23, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Jan, > > [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.4-rc2 next-20151124] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/SYNC_NOIDLE-preemption-for-ancestor-cgroups/20151125-222645 > base:

Re: [PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

On Thu 26-11-15 04:24:23, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Jan, > > [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.4-rc2 next-20151124] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/SYNC_NOIDLE-preemption-for-ancestor-cgroups/20151125-222645 > base:

Re: [PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

Hi Jan, [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.4-rc2 next-20151124] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/SYNC_NOIDLE-preemption-for-ancestor-cgroups/20151125-222645 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git

[PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

From: Jan Kara Currently we don't allow sync workload of one cgroup to preempt sync workload of any other cgroup. This is because we want to achieve service separation between cgroups. However in cases where cgroup preempting is ancestor of the current cgroup, there is no need of separation and

Re: [PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

Hi Jan, [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.4-rc2 next-20151124] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/SYNC_NOIDLE-preemption-for-ancestor-cgroups/20151125-222645 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git

[PATCH 4/4] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child

From: Jan Kara Currently we don't allow sync workload of one cgroup to preempt sync workload of any other cgroup. This is because we want to achieve service separation between cgroups. However in cases where cgroup preempting is ancestor of the current cgroup, there is no need of