We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and
* Tony Lindgren [130718 00:57]:
> * Stephen Warren [130717 14:28]:
> >
> > Oh, I see you're trying to check that the set of pins in the active,
> > sleep, and idle states are identical.
>
> Right, that's to avoid any further checking during runtime for runtime PM.
>
> > But I think that
* Stephen Warren [130717 14:28]:
> On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We want to have static pin states handled separately from
> > dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
> >
> > Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
> > state_idle and
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [130717 14:28]:
On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130718 00:57]:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [130717 14:28]:
Oh, I see you're trying to check that the set of pins in the active,
sleep, and idle states are identical.
Right, that's to avoid any further checking during runtime for runtime PM.
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and
On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We want to have static pin states handled separately from
> dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
>
> Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
> state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
> pin groups to
On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and
10 matches
Mail list logo
