On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:46:17 +0900, Alexandre Courbot
wrote:
> Their value being obtained by gpio_chip_hwgpio(), this better reflects
> their use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
I'm not going to bother with this one. It is churn on things that are
only local variables with no functional
Their value being obtained by gpio_chip_hwgpio(), this better reflects
their use.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 70 +-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> Nitpicky - Is it accurate to call these hardware numbers? Don't some of
> the platforms remap the gpio numbers? These numbers may not match
> against the platform's datasheet for example.
I'm following a suggestion by Grant and Linus W. here.
On 13/02/13 18:03, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> From: Alexandre Courbot
>
> Their value being obtained by gpio_chip_hwgpio(), this better reflects
> their use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 70
> +-
> 1 file
Delivered-To: gnu...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.96.232 with SMTP id dv8csp15271ieb;
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:48:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.68.0.39 with SMTP id 7mr11102539pbb.124.1360504086445;
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.c
From: Alexandre Courbot
Their value being obtained by gpio_chip_hwgpio(), this better reflects
their use.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 70 +-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers
6 matches
Mail list logo
