On 07/26, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov [2012-07-12 19:10:25]:
>
> > Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
> > for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
> > Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
> >
> > Also, move put_page()
On 07/26, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
* Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com [2012-07-12 19:10:25]:
Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
Also, move put_page()
* Oleg Nesterov [2012-07-12 19:10:25]:
> Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
> for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
> Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
>
> Also, move put_page() outside of ptl lock. This doesn't really
> matter
* Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com [2012-07-12 19:10:25]:
Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
Also, move put_page() outside of ptl lock. This doesn't really
Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
Also, move put_page() outside of ptl lock. This doesn't really
matter but looks a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
Like do_wp_page(), __replace_page() should do munlock_vma_page()
for the case when the old page still has other !VM_LOCKED mappings.
Unfortunately this needs mm/internal.h.
Also, move put_page() outside of ptl lock. This doesn't really
matter but looks a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov
6 matches
Mail list logo