Sorry for noise, but just in case...
On 09/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Do you think this can work?
Of course, even if this can work, we should do this later. Let's start
with the simple changes, then we will see if we can actually remove all
other checks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 09/02, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
>
> this patch I think needs more thought for sure. please see below.
Of course.
> > interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
> >
> > if
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
this patch I think needs more thought for sure. please see below.
>
> interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
>
> if (use_eager_fpu())
> return true;
>
>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
this patch I think needs more thought for sure. please see below.
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
if (use_eager_fpu())
return true;
On 09/02, Suresh Siddha wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
this patch I think needs more thought for sure. please see below.
Of course.
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
if
Sorry for noise, but just in case...
On 09/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Do you think this can work?
Of course, even if this can work, we should do this later. Let's start
with the simple changes, then we will see if we can actually remove all
other checks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
if (use_eager_fpu())
return true;
return !__thread_has_fpu(current) &&
(read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS);
and it is absolutely not clear why these 2 cases differ so
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS MORE THE QUESTION THAN THE PATCH.
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() does:
if (use_eager_fpu())
return true;
return !__thread_has_fpu(current)
(read_cr0() X86_CR0_TS);
and it is absolutely not clear why these 2 cases differ so
8 matches
Mail list logo