On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:10:15PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/18, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >
> > On 10/17/2013 11:42 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07:15AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > >> On 10/08/2013 06:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >>> From: Oleg Nester
On 10/18, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2013 11:42 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07:15AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2013 06:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> From: Oleg Nesterov
> >>>
> >>> Add the new struct rcu_sync_ops which holds sync/call metho
On 10/17/2013 11:42 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:07:15AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> On 10/08/2013 06:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> From: Oleg Nesterov
>>>
>>> Add the new struct rcu_sync_ops which holds sync/call methods, and
>>> turn the function pointers in rcu
On 10/08/2013 06:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov
>
> Add the new struct rcu_sync_ops which holds sync/call methods, and
> turn the function pointers in rcu_sync_struct into an array of struct
> rcu_sync_ops.
Hi, Paul
I think this work should be done in rcupdate.[ch] side by
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:25:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov
>
> Add the new struct rcu_sync_ops which holds sync/call methods, and
> turn the function pointers in rcu_sync_struct into an array of struct
> rcu_sync_ops.
>
> This simplifies the "init" helpers, and this wa
From: Oleg Nesterov
Add the new struct rcu_sync_ops which holds sync/call methods, and
turn the function pointers in rcu_sync_struct into an array of struct
rcu_sync_ops.
This simplifies the "init" helpers, and this way it is simpler to add
the new methods we need, especially ifdef'ed.
Signed-o
6 matches
Mail list logo
