On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:50:17 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
> > + if (simple_empty(dentry))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /* Case 2: tree mount, expire iff entire tree is not busy */
> > + if (!exp_leaves) {
> > + /* Path walk currently on this dentry? */
> > + ino_co
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:53 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Here is a revised version of this one patch.
> This one fixes a problem with refcounts on dentry and adds a comment to
> clarify the behaviour of should_expire().
I had some problems with this patch.
Looked like it got munged by the email clien
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 14:05 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:48:33 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
> ...
> > So far I've tracked this to something that was introduced between 3.11
> > and 3.12. One change that went into 3.12 was Jeff Laytons' umount
> > specific path resolution for umount. I
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:48:33 +0800 Ian Kent wrote:
...
> So far I've tracked this to something that was introduced between 3.11
> and 3.12. One change that went into 3.12 was Jeff Laytons' umount
> specific path resolution for umount. I've found this is also broken on
> recent RHEL-6 kernels and t
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:53 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Here is a revised version of this one patch.
> This one fixes a problem with refcounts on dentry and adds a comment to
> clarify the behaviour of should_expire().
I have some bad news I'm afraid, not about the patches.
As I mentioned I'm well
Here is a revised version of this one patch.
This one fixes a problem with refcounts on dentry and adds a comment to
clarify the behaviour of should_expire().
thanks,
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:14:53 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] autofs4: factor should_expire() out of autofs4_e
6 matches
Mail list logo
