Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2018, 13:44 -0400 schrieb Alex Deucher: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to > > > >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2018, 13:44 -0400 schrieb Alex Deucher: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to > > > > not implement and

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to >>> > not implement and still flush), to

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to >> > not implement and still flush), to make sure the AGP horror show >> >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to >> > not implement and still flush), to make sure the AGP horror show >> > doesn't happen again and

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:56:43AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > And to add to the confusion, none of this seems to be an issue on 64-bit > ARM where the generic DMA/IOMMU code from drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c is > used. In the long term I want everyone to use that code. Help welcome!

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:56:43AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > And to add to the confusion, none of this seems to be an issue on 64-bit > ARM where the generic DMA/IOMMU code from drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c is > used. In the long term I want everyone to use that code. Help welcome!

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:30:39AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > > me to show you

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:30:39AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > > me to show you

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > > dma layer work

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > > dma layer work

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:43:35PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > For more fun: > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html > > > > Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu > >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:43:35PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > For more fun: > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html > > > > Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu > >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > > dma layer work

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:09:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > > dma layer work

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > dma layer work for us. That kind of noodling around in lower levels to > get them to do

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:02:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Can we please not nack everything right away? Doesn't really motivate > me to show you all the various things we're doing in gpu to make the > dma layer work for us. That kind of noodling around in lower levels to > get them to do

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> For more fun: >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html >> >> Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu >>

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> For more fun: >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html >> >> Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu >> pagetables are faster

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > For more fun: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html > > Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu > pagetables are faster ... I am not on this list, but remote NAK from here. This needs

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:23:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > For more fun: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html > > Yeah, sometimes we want to disable the iommu because the on-gpu > pagetables are faster ... I am not on this list, but remote NAK from here. This needs

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to > > not implement and still flush), to make sure the AGP horror show > > doesn't happen again and GPU folks are happy with PCIe. That's at > > least my

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to > > not implement and still flush), to make sure the AGP horror show > > doesn't happen again and GPU folks are happy with PCIe. That's at > > least my

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >>>

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >>> there? At least in drm we've pretty

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >>>

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >>> there? At least in drm we've pretty

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >> there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be >> getting

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >> there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be >> getting away without a huge

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >> there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be >> getting

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out >> there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be >> getting away without a huge

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out > there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be > getting away without a huge uproar (at least from driver developers > and users, core folks

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:32:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Out of curiosity, how much virtual flushing stuff is there still out > there? At least in drm we've pretty much ignore this, and seem to be > getting away without a huge uproar (at least from driver developers > and users, core folks

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > At the very lowest level they will need to be handled differently for >> > many architectures, the questions is at what point we'll do the >> >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > At the very lowest level they will need to be handled differently for >> > many architectures, the questions is at what point we'll do the >> > branching out. >> >>

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > At the very lowest level they will need to be handled differently for > > many architectures, the questions is at what point we'll do the > > branching out. > > Having at least struct page also in that list with (dma_addr_t,

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > At the very lowest level they will need to be handled differently for > > many architectures, the questions is at what point we'll do the > > branching out. > > Having at least struct page also in that list with (dma_addr_t,

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:46:25AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > What we need is an sg_alloc_table_from_resources(dev, resources, > > > > num_resources) which does the handling common to all drivers. > > > A structure

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:46:25AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > What we need is an sg_alloc_table_from_resources(dev, resources, > > > > num_resources) which does the handling common to all drivers. > > > A structure

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > What we need is an sg_alloc_table_from_resources(dev, resources, > > > num_resources) which does the handling common to all drivers. > > A structure that contains > > > > {page,offset,len} + {dma_addr+dma_len} > > > > is not

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > What we need is an sg_alloc_table_from_resources(dev, resources, > > > num_resources) which does the handling common to all drivers. > > A structure that contains > > > > {page,offset,len} + {dma_addr+dma_len} > > > > is not

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 20.04.2018 um 12:17 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Christian König wrote: Yes there's a bit a layering violation insofar that drivers really shouldn't each have their own copy of "how do I convert a piece of dma memory into dma-buf", but that doesn't

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 20.04.2018 um 12:17 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Christian König wrote: Yes there's a bit a layering violation insofar that drivers really shouldn't each have their own copy of "how do I convert a piece of dma memory into dma-buf", but that doesn't

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Yes there's a bit a layering violation insofar that drivers really > > shouldn't each have their own copy of "how do I convert a piece of dma > > memory into dma-buf", but that doesn't render the interface a bad idea. > >

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Yes there's a bit a layering violation insofar that drivers really > > shouldn't each have their own copy of "how do I convert a piece of dma > > memory into dma-buf", but that doesn't render the interface a bad idea. > >

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 20.04.2018 um 09:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:16:57AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed gpu memory is very real. Of course we'll never

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 20.04.2018 um 09:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:16:57AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed gpu memory is very real. Of course we'll never

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:16:57AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed > > gpu memory is very real. > > > > Of course we'll never feed such a strange sg table to

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:16:57AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed > > gpu memory is very real. > > > > Of course we'll never feed such a strange sg table to

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed > gpu memory is very real. > > Of course we'll never feed such a strange sg table to a driver which > doesn't understand it, but allowing sg_page == NULL works

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've broken that assumption in i915 years ago. Not struct page backed > gpu memory is very real. > > Of course we'll never feed such a strange sg table to a driver which > doesn't understand it, but allowing sg_page == NULL works

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> I did not mean you should dma_map_sg/page. I just meant that using >> dma_map_resource to fill only the dma address part of the sg table seems >>

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> I did not mean you should dma_map_sg/page. I just meant that using >> dma_map_resource to fill only the dma address part of the sg table seems >> perfectly sufficient. > >

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I did not mean you should dma_map_sg/page. I just meant that using > dma_map_resource to fill only the dma address part of the sg table seems > perfectly sufficient. But that is not how the interface work, especially facing

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I did not mean you should dma_map_sg/page. I just meant that using > dma_map_resource to fill only the dma address part of the sg table seems > perfectly sufficient. But that is not how the interface work, especially facing

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:06:45PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200,

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:06:45PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200,

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device > > > resources which are not backed by

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device > > > resources which are not backed by

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device resources which are not backed by pages. Signed-off-by: Christian König Um strictly

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Am 29.03.2018 um 08:57 schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device resources which are not backed by pages. Signed-off-by: Christian König Um strictly speaking they all should, but

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device > resources which are not backed by pages. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Um strictly speaking they all should, but ttm never

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device > resources which are not backed by pages. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König Um strictly speaking they all should, but ttm never bothered to use the real

[PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device resources which are not backed by pages. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 1 + include/linux/dma-buf.h | 4 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

[PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: add peer2peer flag

Add a peer2peer flag noting that the importer can deal with device resources which are not backed by pages. Signed-off-by: Christian König --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 1 + include/linux/dma-buf.h | 4 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c