On Thursday 14 February 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I left it out intentionally as these are private to mach-omap2,
> and I'd like to simplify the indirect includes there further.
> So I'd rather just remove the duplicate soc.h from drm.c.
>
> If people really think this should be applied, I
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
I left it out intentionally as these are private to mach-omap2,
and I'd like to simplify the indirect includes there further.
So I'd rather just remove the duplicate soc.h from drm.c.
If people really think this should be applied, I have no
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I left it out intentionally as these are private to mach-omap2,
> and I'd like to simplify the indirect includes there further.
> So I'd rather just remove the duplicate soc.h from drm.c.
>
> If people really think this should be applied, I
* Arnd Bergmann [130214 14:51]:
> Commit e4c060db "ARM: OMAP: Split plat/cpu.h into local soc.h for
> mach-omap1 and mach-omap2" moved the bulk of "plat/cpu.h" into "cpu.h"
> but did not add an include guard for the new file that was present
> in the old one. There are cases where the file is
Commit e4c060db "ARM: OMAP: Split plat/cpu.h into local soc.h for
mach-omap1 and mach-omap2" moved the bulk of "plat/cpu.h" into "cpu.h"
but did not add an include guard for the new file that was present
in the old one. There are cases where the file is indeed included
multiple times, probably by
Commit e4c060db ARM: OMAP: Split plat/cpu.h into local soc.h for
mach-omap1 and mach-omap2 moved the bulk of plat/cpu.h into cpu.h
but did not add an include guard for the new file that was present
in the old one. There are cases where the file is indeed included
multiple times, probably by
* Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [130214 14:51]:
Commit e4c060db ARM: OMAP: Split plat/cpu.h into local soc.h for
mach-omap1 and mach-omap2 moved the bulk of plat/cpu.h into cpu.h
but did not add an include guard for the new file that was present
in the old one. There are cases where the file is
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
I left it out intentionally as these are private to mach-omap2,
and I'd like to simplify the indirect includes there further.
So I'd rather just remove the duplicate soc.h from drm.c.
If people really think this should be applied, I have no
8 matches
Mail list logo