4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchi...@gmail.com> commit a91e0f680bcd9e10c253ae8b62462a38bd48f09f upstream. When using get_options() it's possible to specify a range of numbers, like 1-100500. The problem is that it doesn't track array size while calling internally to get_range() which iterates over the range and fills the memory with numbers. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2613c75c-b04d-4bff-82a6-12f97ba0f...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchi...@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- lib/cmdline.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/lib/cmdline.c +++ b/lib/cmdline.c @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options. */ -static int get_range(char **str, int *pint) +static int get_range(char **str, int *pint, int n) { int x, inc_counter, upper_range; (*str)++; upper_range = simple_strtol((*str), NULL, 0); inc_counter = upper_range - *pint; - for (x = *pint; x < upper_range; x++) + for (x = *pint; n && x < upper_range; x++, n--) *pint++ = x; return inc_counter; } @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int n break; if (res == 3) { int range_nums; - range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i); + range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i, nints - i); if (range_nums < 0) break; /*
