Re: [PATCH 4.19] net/mlx5e: Don't support phys switch id if not in switchdev mode

2020-09-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:46:36AM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 15:13 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 07:05:42PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > From: Roi Dayan > > > > > > Support for phys switch id ndo added for representors and if > > >

Re: [PATCH 4.19] net/mlx5e: Don't support phys switch id if not in switchdev mode

2020-09-10 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 15:13 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 07:05:42PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > From: Roi Dayan > > > > Support for phys switch id ndo added for representors and if > > we do not have representors there is no need to support it. > > Since each

Re: [PATCH 4.19] net/mlx5e: Don't support phys switch id if not in switchdev mode

2020-08-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 07:05:42PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Roi Dayan > > Support for phys switch id ndo added for representors and if > we do not have representors there is no need to support it. > Since each port return different switch id supporting this > block support for

[PATCH 4.19] net/mlx5e: Don't support phys switch id if not in switchdev mode

2020-08-06 Thread Saeed Mahameed
From: Roi Dayan Support for phys switch id ndo added for representors and if we do not have representors there is no need to support it. Since each port return different switch id supporting this block support for creating bond over PFs and attaching to bridge in legacy mode. This bug doesn't