[ Upstream commit d825db346270dbceef83b7b750dbc29f1d7dcc0e ]

Clang warns about what is clearly a case of passing an uninitalized
variable into a static function:

drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1852:23: error: variable 'gains' is 
uninitialized when used here
      [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
                lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30);
                                    ^~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_lp.c:1838:2: note: variable 'gains' is 
declared here
        struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains;
        ^
1 error generated.

However, this function is empty, and its arguments are never evaluated,
so gcc in contrast does not warn here. Both compilers behave in a
reasonable way as far as I can tell, so we should change the code
to avoid the warning everywhere.

We could just eliminate the lpphy_papd_cal() function entirely,
given that it has had the TODO comment in it for 10 years now
and is rather unlikely to ever get done. I'm doing a simpler
change here, and just pass the 'oldgains' variable in that has
been initialized, based on the guess that this is what was
originally meant.

Fixes: 2c0d6100da3e ("b43: LP-PHY: Begin implementing calibration & software 
RFKILL support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
index 058a9f2320503..55cb07693ae80 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
@@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev, struct 
lpphy_tx_gains gains,
 static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
        struct b43_phy_lp *lpphy = dev->phy.lp;
-       struct lpphy_tx_gains gains, oldgains;
+       struct lpphy_tx_gains oldgains;
        int old_txpctl, old_afe_ovr, old_rf, old_bbmult;
 
        lpphy_read_tx_pctl_mode_from_hardware(dev);
@@ -1848,9 +1848,9 @@ static void lpphy_papd_cal_txpwr(struct b43_wldev *dev)
        lpphy_set_tx_power_control(dev, B43_LPPHY_TXPCTL_OFF);
 
        if (dev->dev->chip_id == 0x4325 && dev->dev->chip_rev == 0)
-               lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 30);
+               lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 30);
        else
-               lpphy_papd_cal(dev, gains, 0, 1, 65);
+               lpphy_papd_cal(dev, oldgains, 0, 1, 65);
 
        if (old_afe_ovr)
                lpphy_set_tx_gains(dev, oldgains);
-- 
2.20.1



Reply via email to