Re: [PATCH 4.8 022/138] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-11-09 Thread Jacob Pan
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:45:05 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > I just realized that this patch would prevent module auto loading since we don't have device id table. I will send out this

Re: [PATCH 4.8 022/138] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-11-09 Thread Jacob Pan
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:45:05 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > I just realized that this patch would prevent module auto loading since we don't have device id table. I will send out this patch in a minute. So we

[PATCH 4.8 022/138] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-11-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Ernst commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 upstream. Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features rather than the intended

[PATCH 4.8 022/138] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-11-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Ernst commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 upstream. Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features rather than the intended AND. Updated to use