4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 30fa627b32230737bc3f678067e2adfecf956987 ]

Fix the assigned type of mem2mem buffer handling API.
Namely, these functions:

 v4l2_m2m_next_buf
 v4l2_m2m_last_buf
 v4l2_m2m_buf_remove
 v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf
 v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf
 v4l2_m2m_last_src_buf
 v4l2_m2m_last_dst_buf
 v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove
 v4l2_m2m_dst_buf_remove

return a struct vb2_v4l2_buffer, and not a struct vb2_buffer.

Fixing this is necessary to fix the mem2mem buffer handling API,
changing the return to the correct struct vb2_v4l2_buffer instead
of a void pointer.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequ...@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-ci...@xs4all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+sams...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/media/platform/s5p-g2d/g2d.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-g2d/g2d.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-g2d/g2d.c
index 62c0dec30b59..5f6ccf492111 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-g2d/g2d.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-g2d/g2d.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void device_run(void *prv)
 {
        struct g2d_ctx *ctx = prv;
        struct g2d_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
-       struct vb2_buffer *src, *dst;
+       struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src, *dst;
        unsigned long flags;
        u32 cmd = 0;
 
@@ -513,10 +513,10 @@ static void device_run(void *prv)
        spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->ctrl_lock, flags);
 
        g2d_set_src_size(dev, &ctx->in);
-       g2d_set_src_addr(dev, vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(src, 0));
+       g2d_set_src_addr(dev, vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&src->vb2_buf, 0));
 
        g2d_set_dst_size(dev, &ctx->out);
-       g2d_set_dst_addr(dev, vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(dst, 0));
+       g2d_set_dst_addr(dev, vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&dst->vb2_buf, 0));
 
        g2d_set_rop4(dev, ctx->rop);
        g2d_set_flip(dev, ctx->flip);
-- 
2.19.1



Reply via email to