Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-17 Thread Juergen Gross
On 15/04/16 21:16, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Mike Christie > > The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers > and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which > will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so > they can send a

Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-17 Thread Juergen Gross
On 15/04/16 21:16, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Mike Christie > > The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers > and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which > will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so > they can send a write/flush combo. > >

[PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread mchristi
From: Mike Christie The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so they can send a write/flush combo. This patch drops xen's use of REQ_FLUSH

[PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread mchristi
From: Mike Christie The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so they can send a write/flush combo. This patch drops xen's use of REQ_FLUSH to track if it

Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread Mike Christie
On 04/15/2016 05:50 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 15/04/16 12:40, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Mike Christie >> >> The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers >> and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which >> will be used by file systems

Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread Mike Christie
On 04/15/2016 05:50 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 15/04/16 12:40, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Mike Christie >> >> The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers >> and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which >> will be used by file systems and make_request_fn

Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread Juergen Gross
On 15/04/16 12:40, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Mike Christie > > The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers > and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which > will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so > they can send a

Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread Juergen Gross
On 15/04/16 12:40, mchri...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Mike Christie > > The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers > and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which > will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so > they can send a write/flush combo. > >

[PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread mchristi
From: Mike Christie The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so they can send a write/flush combo. This patch drops xen's use of REQ_FLUSH

[PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support

2016-04-15 Thread mchristi
From: Mike Christie The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so they can send a write/flush combo. This patch drops xen's use of REQ_FLUSH to track if it