Re: [PATCH 48/52] tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue

2012-07-25 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:41:44PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > From: Len Brown > > Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number, > much higher than 100%. > > c1% is not measured, it is derived as "that, which is left over" > from other counters. However, the other counters are

Re: [PATCH 48/52] tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue

2012-07-25 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:41:44PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number, much higher than 100%. c1% is not measured, it is derived as that, which is left over from other counters. However, the other

[PATCH 48/52] tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue

2012-07-24 Thread Len Brown
From: Len Brown Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number, much higher than 100%. c1% is not measured, it is derived as "that, which is left over" from other counters. However, the other counters are not collected atomically, and so it is possible for c1% to be calaculagted

[PATCH 48/52] tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue

2012-07-24 Thread Len Brown
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number, much higher than 100%. c1% is not measured, it is derived as that, which is left over from other counters. However, the other counters are not collected atomically, and so it is possible for c1%