On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:41:44PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number,
> much higher than 100%.
>
> c1% is not measured, it is derived as "that, which is left over"
> from other counters. However, the other counters are
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:41:44PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number,
much higher than 100%.
c1% is not measured, it is derived as that, which is left over
from other counters. However, the other
From: Len Brown
Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number,
much higher than 100%.
c1% is not measured, it is derived as "that, which is left over"
from other counters. However, the other counters are not collected
atomically, and so it is possible for c1% to be calaculagted
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
Under some conditions, c1% was displayed as very large number,
much higher than 100%.
c1% is not measured, it is derived as that, which is left over
from other counters. However, the other counters are not collected
atomically, and so it is possible for c1%
4 matches
Mail list logo