On 7/30/19 9:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:59:04PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 7/29/19 5:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:18:19PM +0200, luca abeni wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:56 +0100
Dietmar
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:59:04PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 7/29/19 5:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:18:19PM +0200, luca abeni wrote:
> >> Hi Dietmar,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:56 +0100
> >> Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >>
> >>> To make the decision
On 7/29/19 5:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:18:19PM +0200, luca abeni wrote:
>> Hi Dietmar,
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:56 +0100
>> Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>
>>> To make the decision whether to set rq or running bw to 0 in underflow
>>> case use the return value of
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:18:19PM +0200, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:56 +0100
> Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>
> > To make the decision whether to set rq or running bw to 0 in underflow
> > case use the return value of SCHED_WARN_ON() rather than an extra if
> >
Hi Dietmar,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:56 +0100
Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> To make the decision whether to set rq or running bw to 0 in underflow
> case use the return value of SCHED_WARN_ON() rather than an extra if
> condition.
I think I tried this at some point, but if I remember well this
To make the decision whether to set rq or running bw to 0 in underflow
case use the return value of SCHED_WARN_ON() rather than an extra if
condition.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
6 matches
Mail list logo