On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 05:17 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
>> This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
>>
>> This patch naievely changes the vmscan code to
On 03/21/2014 05:17 PM, John Stultz wrote:
Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
This patch naievely changes the vmscan code to continue scanning
and shrinking the lrus even when there is no swap.
On 03/21/2014 05:17 PM, John Stultz wrote:
Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
This patch naievely changes the vmscan code to continue scanning
and shrinking the lrus even when there is no swap.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/21/2014 05:17 PM, John Stultz wrote:
Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
This patch naievely changes the vmscan code
Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
This patch naievely changes the vmscan code to continue scanning
and shrinking the lrus even when there is no swap.
It obviously has performance issues.
Currently we don't shrink/scan the anonymous lrus when swap is off.
This is problematic for volatile range purging on swapless systems/
This patch naievely changes the vmscan code to continue scanning
and shrinking the lrus even when there is no swap.
It obviously has performance issues.
6 matches
Mail list logo