On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:13:37 -0700
Tim Gardner wrote:
> As suggested by Jeff Layton:
>
>
> "Now that I look though, it's clear to me that cifs_set_file_size is
> just wrong. Currently it calls ops->set_path_size and if that fails
> with certain error codes it tries to do a
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:13:37 -0700
Tim Gardner t...@tpi.com wrote:
As suggested by Jeff Layton:
Now that I look though, it's clear to me that cifs_set_file_size is
just wrong. Currently it calls ops-set_path_size and if that fails
with certain error codes it tries to do a
As suggested by Jeff Layton:
"Now that I look though, it's clear to me that cifs_set_file_size is
just wrong. Currently it calls ops->set_path_size and if that fails
with certain error codes it tries to do a SMBLegacyOpen, etc. That's
going to fall on its face if this is a SMB2/3
As suggested by Jeff Layton:
Now that I look though, it's clear to me that cifs_set_file_size is
just wrong. Currently it calls ops-set_path_size and if that fails
with certain error codes it tries to do a SMBLegacyOpen, etc. That's
going to fall on its face if this is a SMB2/3
4 matches
Mail list logo