On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Rob Clark writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Rob Clark writes:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Rob Clark writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Rob Clark writes:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
Rob Clark writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Rob Clark writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still
Rob Clark writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Rob Clark writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Rob Clark writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
>>> BPO registers, we want to keep
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Rob Clark writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
>>> BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
>>> putting a new set
Rob Clark writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
>> BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
>> putting a new set of overflow memory in
Rob Clark writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
>> BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
>> putting a new set of overflow memory in the registers, we need to
>> assign
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
> BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
> putting a new set of overflow memory in the registers, we need to
> assign the old one
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
> BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
> putting a new set of overflow memory in the registers, we need to
> assign the old one to the last
Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
putting a new set of overflow memory in the registers, we need to
assign the old one to the last rendering job using it.
We were looking at "what's currently
Overflow memory handling is tricky: While it's still referenced by the
BPO registers, we want to keep it from being freed. When we are
putting a new set of overflow memory in the registers, we need to
assign the old one to the last rendering job using it.
We were looking at "what's currently
12 matches
Mail list logo