On 8/5/13 1:53 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for your nice job! I got some questions.
On 08/03/2013 04:05 AM, David Ahern wrote:
static int kvm_events_hash_fn(u64 key)
{
return key & (EVENTS_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
@@ -472,7 +501,11 @@ static bool handle_end_event(struct
On 8/5/13 1:53 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for your nice job! I got some questions.
On 08/03/2013 04:05 AM, David Ahern wrote:
static int kvm_events_hash_fn(u64 key)
{
return key (EVENTS_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
@@ -472,7 +501,11 @@ static bool handle_end_event(struct
Hi David,
Thanks for your nice job! I got some questions.
On 08/03/2013 04:05 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> static int kvm_events_hash_fn(u64 key)
> {
> return key & (EVENTS_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> @@ -472,7 +501,11 @@ static bool handle_end_event(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm,
>
Hi David,
Thanks for your nice job! I got some questions.
On 08/03/2013 04:05 AM, David Ahern wrote:
static int kvm_events_hash_fn(u64 key)
{
return key (EVENTS_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
@@ -472,7 +501,11 @@ static bool handle_end_event(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm,
perf kvm stat currently requires back to back record and report commands
to see stats. e.g,.
perf kvm stat record -p $pid -- sleep 1
perf kvm stat report
This is inconvenvient for on box monitoring of a VM. This patch introduces
a 'live' mode that in effect combines the record plus report
perf kvm stat currently requires back to back record and report commands
to see stats. e.g,.
perf kvm stat record -p $pid -- sleep 1
perf kvm stat report
This is inconvenvient for on box monitoring of a VM. This patch introduces
a 'live' mode that in effect combines the record plus report
6 matches
Mail list logo