From: luca abeni <luca.ab...@santannapisa.it>
commit 1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f upstream.
syzbot reported the following warning:
[ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 17089 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:255
task_non_contending+0xae0/0x1950
line 255 of deadline.c is:
WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer));
in task_non_contending().
Unfortunately, in some cases (for example, a deadline task
continuosly blocking and waking immediately) it can happen that
a task blocks (and task_non_contending() is called) while the
0-lag timer is still active.
In this case, the safest thing to do is to immediately decrease
the running bandwidth of the task, without trying to re-arm the 0-lag timer.
Signed-off-by: luca abeni <luca.ab...@santannapisa.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: chengjian (D) <cj.chengj...@huawei.com>
Link:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325131530.34706-1-luca.ab...@santannapisa.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct t
if (dl_entity_is_special(dl_se))
return;
- WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer));
WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending);
zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline -
@@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct t
* If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active
* utilization now, instead of starting a timer
*/
- if (zerolag_time < 0) {
+ if ((zerolag_time < 0) || hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) {
if (dl_task(p))
sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) {
