On 24/11/2020 11:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
>> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
>> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that
On 24/11/2020 11:37, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
>> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
>> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is faster. It also handles
> zero-len bvecs, so can
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is faster. It also handles
> zero-len bvecs, so can
Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is faster. It also handles
zero-len bvecs, so can kill bvec_iter_skip_zero_bvec().
textdata bss dec
5 matches
Mail list logo