From: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>

commit 8aa7b526dc0b5dbf40c1b834d76a667ad672a410 upstream.

With multiple DNAT rules it's possible that after destination
translation the resulting tuples collide.

For example, two openvswitch flows:
nw_dst=10.0.0.10,tp_dst=10, actions=ct(commit,table=2,nat(dst=20.0.0.1:20))
nw_dst=10.0.0.20,tp_dst=10, actions=ct(commit,table=2,nat(dst=20.0.0.1:20))

Assuming two TCP clients initiating the following connections:
10.0.0.10:5000->10.0.0.10:10
10.0.0.10:5000->10.0.0.20:10

Both tuples would translate to 10.0.0.10:5000->20.0.0.1:20 causing
nf_conntrack_confirm() to fail because of tuple collision.

Netfilter handles this case by allocating a null binding for SNAT at
egress by default.  Perform the same operation in openvswitch for DNAT
if no explicit SNAT is requested by the user and allocate a null binding
for SNAT for packets in the "original" direction.

Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1877128
Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
Fixes: 05752523e565 ("openvswitch: Interface with NAT.")
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/openvswitch/conntrack.c |   20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -905,15 +905,19 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, s
        }
        err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range, maniptype);
 
-       if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
-           ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
-               if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
-                       maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
-               else
-                       maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
+       if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
+               if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
+                       if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
+                               maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
+                       else
+                               maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
 
-               err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range,
-                                        maniptype);
+                       err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range,
+                                                maniptype);
+               } else if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
+                       err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, NULL,
+                                                NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
+               }
        }
 
        /* Mark NAT done if successful and update the flow key. */


Reply via email to