On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
> On 08/08/13 19:46, Zach Brown wrote:
> >>> even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
> >>> as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
> >>> the API in the future.
> >>
> >>
On 08/08/13 19:46, Zach Brown wrote:
>>> even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
>>> as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
>>> the API in the future.
>>
>> I agree. As replied here,
>>
> > even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
> > as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
> > the API in the future.
>
> I agree. As replied here,
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg24047.html
> please keep
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:33:14AM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
> On 07.08.2013 23:43, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > From: Sergei Trofimovich
> >
> > Found by uselex.rb:
> >> btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o
> >> fs/btrfs/built-in.o fs/btrfs/reada.o
>
> even though the
On 07.08.2013 23:43, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> From: Sergei Trofimovich
>
> Found by uselex.rb:
>> btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o fs/btrfs/built-in.o
>> fs/btrfs/reada.o
even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
as it's part of the
On 07.08.2013 23:43, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
From: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
Found by uselex.rb:
btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o fs/btrfs/built-in.o
fs/btrfs/reada.o
even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
as it's part
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:33:14AM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
On 07.08.2013 23:43, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
From: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
Found by uselex.rb:
btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o
fs/btrfs/built-in.o fs/btrfs/reada.o
even though the
even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
the API in the future.
I agree. As replied here,
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg24047.html
please keep the
On 08/08/13 19:46, Zach Brown wrote:
even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
the API in the future.
I agree. As replied here,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
On 08/08/13 19:46, Zach Brown wrote:
even though the function is currently unused, I'm hesitating to remove it
as it's part of the reada-API and might be handy for anyone going to use
the API in the future.
I agree. As replied
From: Sergei Trofimovich
Found by uselex.rb:
> btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o fs/btrfs/built-in.o
> fs/btrfs/reada.o
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 -
fs/btrfs/reada.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff
From: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
Found by uselex.rb:
btrfs_reada_detach: [R]: exported from: fs/btrfs/btrfs.o fs/btrfs/built-in.o
fs/btrfs/reada.o
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 -
fs/btrfs/reada.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 1
12 matches
Mail list logo