On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:02:32PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> That is what I started out with, and the results were not
> as stable as with this calculation.
>
> Having said that, I did that before I came up with patch 7/7,
> so maybe the effect would no longer be as pronounced any more
> as it
On 01/20/2014 11:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:12:08PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index 0af6c1a..52de567 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:12:08PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 0af6c1a..52de567 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@ struct task_struct {
> int numa_preferred_nid;
>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:12:08PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0af6c1a..52de567 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@ struct task_struct {
int numa_preferred_nid;
On 01/20/2014 11:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:12:08PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0af6c1a..52de567 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@ struct
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:02:32PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
That is what I started out with, and the results were not
as stable as with this calculation.
Having said that, I did that before I came up with patch 7/7,
so maybe the effect would no longer be as pronounced any more
as it was
From: Rik van Riel
The tracepoint has made it abundantly clear that the naive
implementation of the faults_from code has issues.
Specifically, the garbage collector in some workloads will
access orders of magnitudes more memory than the threads
that do all the active work. This resulted in the
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
The tracepoint has made it abundantly clear that the naive
implementation of the faults_from code has issues.
Specifically, the garbage collector in some workloads will
access orders of magnitudes more memory than the threads
that do all the active work. This
8 matches
Mail list logo
