Hi,
On 09/16/2015 11:52 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 11:30:26 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
>> On 09/16/2015 07:09 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 17:25:38 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 11:30:26 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> On 09/16/2015 07:09 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 17:25:38 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> >> On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >>> From: Alexandru M Stan
> >>>
> >>> This algorithm will
Hi,
On 09/16/2015 07:09 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 17:25:38 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
>> On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> From: Alexandru M Stan
>>>
>>> This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
>>> what resol
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 15. September 2015, 17:25:38 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Alexandru M Stan
> >
> > This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
> > what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus,
Dear, Heiko.
On 09/01/2015 03:24 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Alexandru M Stan
>
> This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
> what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus, doing
> many tunings yields better results since some tests are r
From: Alexandru M Stan
This algorithm will try 1 degree increments, since there's no way to tell
what resolution the underlying phase code uses. As an added bonus, doing
many tunings yields better results since some tests are run more than once
(ex: if the underlying driver uses 45 degree increme
6 matches
Mail list logo