On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:02:03PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> Use an explicit if/else branch after __save_init_fpu(old) in
> switch_fpu_prepare. This makes substituting the assignment
> with a call to task_disable_lazy_fpu() in the next patch easier
> to review.
>
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:02:03PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Use an explicit if/else branch after __save_init_fpu(old) in
switch_fpu_prepare. This makes substituting the assignment
with a call to task_disable_lazy_fpu() in the next patch easier
to
From: Rik van Riel
Use an explicit if/else branch after __save_init_fpu(old) in
switch_fpu_prepare. This makes substituting the assignment
with a call to task_disable_lazy_fpu() in the next patch easier
to review.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 5 +++--
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Use an explicit if/else branch after __save_init_fpu(old) in
switch_fpu_prepare. This makes substituting the assignment
with a call to task_disable_lazy_fpu() in the next patch easier
to review.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
---
4 matches
Mail list logo