On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:20:10PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > Old Signed by an unknown key
> > >
> > > On Wed,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:20:10PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and resets by parsing
> > > the relevant existing DT nodes for PCIe and gr3d. For clocks, this isn't
> >
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and resets by parsing
> > the relevant existing DT nodes for PCIe and gr3d. For clocks, this isn't
> > even needed as we can always register some extra clkdev's to get them.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:08:16PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:31:47PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >
> You could also take the easy way out and enable all power domains by
> default. So drivers won't be able to disable the power domain on old
> DTBs where they aren't hooked up, but the will continue to function
> without calling
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > Old Signed by an unknown key
> > >
> > > On Tue,
Am Mittwoch, den 09.07.2014, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, but the problem is that
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other
> > > > modules
> > > > in the same
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other
> > > modules
> > > in the same domain to safely control the domain's status. Eg: the ISPs,
> > > VI and
> > > CSI share a domain. VI and CSI are
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other
modules
in the same domain to safely control
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Yes, but the problem is that you also need
Am Mittwoch, den 09.07.2014, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Old Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:31:47PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
You could also take the easy way out and enable all power domains by
default. So drivers won't be able to disable the power domain on old
DTBs where they aren't hooked up, but the will continue to function
without calling into the
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:08:16PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:33:11AM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and resets by parsing
the relevant existing DT nodes for PCIe and gr3d. For clocks, this isn't
even needed as we can always register some extra clkdev's to get them. There
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and resets by parsing
the relevant existing DT nodes for PCIe and gr3d. For clocks, this isn't
even
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
For those 2 domains we can find the necessary clocks and
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:20:10PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:43:44PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:20:10PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Old Signed by an unknown key
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other
modules
in the same domain to safely control the domain's status. Eg: the ISPs,
VI and
CSI share a domain. VI and CSI are useable without
> >
> > Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other modules
> > in the same domain to safely control the domain's status. Eg: the ISPs, VI
> > and
> > CSI share a domain. VI and CSI are useable without ISP and the ISP lacks
> > public documentation. So it's not unlikely
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:14:42PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:01:47PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >> On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:14:42PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:01:47PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver
Yes, but the problem is that you also need clocks and reset of other modules
in the same domain to safely control the domain's status. Eg: the ISPs, VI
and
CSI share a domain. VI and CSI are useable without ISP and the ISP lacks
public documentation. So it's not unlikely a VI and CSI
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:01:47PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 06:01:47PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 17,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:02:35AM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:02:35AM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On
On 06/19/2014 02:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > Old Signed by an unknown key
> > >
> > > On Mon,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Old Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at
On 06/18/2014 06:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Old Signed by
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > > This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
> > >
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
> > tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
> > cannot be used in situations where the
I'll try removing use of all libahci_platform stuff except
ahci_platform_init_host for v2.
On 17/06/14 15:13, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This symbol needs
I'll try removing use of all libahci_platform stuff except
ahci_platform_init_host for v2.
On 17/06/14 15:13, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This symbol needs
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
cannot be used in situations where the driver
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:01:46PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:13:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:01:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
> tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
> cannot be used in situations where the driver wants to handle clocking
> by itself.
Thierry, are you OK with
On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
cannot be used in situations where the driver wants to handle clocking
by itself.
Thierry, are you OK with this
This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
cannot be used in situations where the driver wants to handle clocking
by itself.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen
---
arch/arm/mach-tegra/powergate.c | 1 +
1
This symbol needs to be exported to power on rails without using
tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up. tegra_powergate_sequence_power_up
cannot be used in situations where the driver wants to handle clocking
by itself.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen mperttu...@nvidia.com
---
52 matches
Mail list logo