[Re: [PATCH 7/8] fs: make devpts/inode.c explicitly non-modular] On 17/12/2015
(Thu 11:46) Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 12/17/2015 11:11 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
> > config UNIX98_PT
[Re: [PATCH 7/8] fs: make devpts/inode.c explicitly non-modular] On 17/12/2015
(Thu 11:46) Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 12/17/2015 11:11 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
> > config UNIX98_PT
Hi Paul,
On 12/17/2015 11:11 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> config UNIX98_PTYS
> bool "Unix98 PTY support" if EXPERT
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> Lets remove the couple traces
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
config UNIX98_PTYS
bool "Unix98 PTY support" if EXPERT
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modularity so that when reading the
driver there is no doubt it is
Hi Paul,
On 12/17/2015 11:11 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> config UNIX98_PTYS
> bool "Unix98 PTY support" if EXPERT
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> Lets remove the couple traces
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
config UNIX98_PTYS
bool "Unix98 PTY support" if EXPERT
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modularity so that when reading the
driver there is no doubt it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
