Re: [PATCH 8/8] IB/mlx5: Replace counting semaphore sem with wait condition

2016-10-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01:02PM +0530, Binoy Jayan wrote: > Counting semaphores are going away in the future, so replace the semaphore > umr_common::sem with an open-coded implementation. And NAK again..

Re: [PATCH 8/8] IB/mlx5: Replace counting semaphore sem with wait condition

2016-10-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01:02PM +0530, Binoy Jayan wrote: > Counting semaphores are going away in the future, so replace the semaphore > umr_common::sem with an open-coded implementation. And NAK again..

[PATCH 8/8] IB/mlx5: Replace counting semaphore sem with wait condition

2016-10-17 Thread Binoy Jayan
Counting semaphores are going away in the future, so replace the semaphore umr_common::sem with an open-coded implementation. Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan --- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c| 3 ++- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 3 ++-

[PATCH 8/8] IB/mlx5: Replace counting semaphore sem with wait condition

2016-10-17 Thread Binoy Jayan
Counting semaphores are going away in the future, so replace the semaphore umr_common::sem with an open-coded implementation. Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan --- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c| 3 ++- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 3 ++- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 28