On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 12:24 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:53:59 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:11 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
> > > I do
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:53:59 -0700
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:11 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > > op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
> > I don't understand this patch. info.rv is s32 (and I assume that "r
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:11 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
> I don't understand this patch. info.rv is s32 (and I assume that "rv"
> stands for "return value").
In this case it's not a return
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700
> Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
> >
>
> I don't understand this patch. info.rv is s32 (and I assume that "rv"
> stands for "return value"). What I don'
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:23:43 -0700
Joe Perches wrote:
> op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
>
I don't understand this patch. info.rv is s32 (and I assume that "rv"
stands for "return value"). What I don't get is why you think it's just
used as a u8. It seems to be used more like
op->info.rv is an s32, but it's only used as a u8.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 6 +++---
fs/lockd/svclock.c | 10 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 3e0b6fc..267849d
6 matches
Mail list logo
