* Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
>
> On March 10, 2015 12:45:01 AM EDT, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >
> >> This changes the structure sta2x11_dma_ops stucture to use
> >switolb_dma_supported as it's
> >> function for dma_supported hardware verus setting this value to NULL
* Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This changes the structure sta2x11_dma_ops stucture to use
> switolb_dma_supported as it's
> function for dma_supported hardware verus setting this value to NULL as this
> should be set
> correctly for when dma_supported function needs to be called for hardware
>
* nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-02-16 02:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >
> >> This changes the structure sta2x11_dma_ops stucture to
> >> use switolb_dma_supported as it's function for
> >> dma_supported hardware verus setting this value to NULL
> >> as this sh
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This changes the structure sta2x11_dma_ops stucture to use
> switolb_dma_supported
> as it's function for dma_supported hardware verus setting this value to NULL
> as
> this should be set correctly for when dma_supported function needs to
* Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This changes the structure sta2x11_dma_ops stucture to
> use switolb_dma_supported as it's function for
> dma_supported hardware verus setting this value to NULL
> as this should be set correctly for when dma_supported
> function needs to be called for this hardwar
5 matches
Mail list logo