Hi,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 3:10 AM Roman Penyaev wrote:
>
> On 2019-10-07 20:43, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On 10/7/19 2:30 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> >> On 2019-10-07 18:42, Jason Baron wrote:
> >>> On 10/7/19 6:54 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
> > On
On 2019-10-07 20:43, Jason Baron wrote:
[...]
But what if to make this wakeup explicit if we have more events to
process?
(nothing is tested, just a guess)
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct ep_pqueue {
struct ep_send_events_data {
int maxevents;
struct epoll_event __user *events;
+
On 2019-10-07 20:43, Jason Baron wrote:
On 10/7/19 2:30 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-10-07 18:42, Jason Baron wrote:
On 10/7/19 6:54 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On
On 10/7/19 2:30 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-10-07 18:42, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On 10/7/19 6:54 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>> On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019
On 2019-10-07 18:42, Jason Baron wrote:
On 10/7/19 6:54 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
From: Heiher
Take the case where we
On 10/7/19 6:54 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>> On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
> From: Heiher
>
> Take the case where we have:
On 2019-10-03 18:13, Jason Baron wrote:
On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
From: Heiher
Take the case where we have:
t0
| (ew)
e0
| (et)
e1
|
On 9/30/19 7:55 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
>>
>>> From: Heiher
>>>
>>> Take the case where we have:
>>>
>>> t0
>>> | (ew)
>>> e0
>>> | (et)
>>> e1
>>>
On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
From: Heiher
Take the case where we have:
t0
| (ew)
e0
| (et)
e1
| (lt)
s0
t0: thread 0
e0: epoll fd 0
e1: epoll fd 1
s0: socket fd 0
ew:
On 2019-09-28 04:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
From: Heiher
Take the case where we have:
t0
| (ew)
e0
| (et)
e1
| (lt)
s0
t0: thread 0
e0: epoll fd 0
e1: epoll fd 1
s0: socket fd 0
ew:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:56:03 +0800 hev wrote:
> From: Heiher
>
> Take the case where we have:
>
> t0
> | (ew)
> e0
> | (et)
> e1
> | (lt)
> s0
>
> t0: thread 0
> e0: epoll fd 0
> e1: epoll fd 1
> s0: socket fd 0
> ew: epoll_wait
>
From: Heiher
Take the case where we have:
t0
| (ew)
e0
| (et)
e1
| (lt)
s0
t0: thread 0
e0: epoll fd 0
e1: epoll fd 1
s0: socket fd 0
ew: epoll_wait
et: edge-trigger
lt: level-trigger
We only need to wakeup nested epoll fds if
12 matches
Mail list logo
