On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 23:03 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:20 PM Tom Zanussi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ramon,
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 20:14 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > >
> > > On June 9, 2020 8:10:43 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <
> > > bige...@linutronix.de>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:20 PM Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> Hi Ramon,
>
> On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 20:14 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> >
> > On June 9, 2020 8:10:43 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <
> > bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > > On 2020-06-09 20:07:06 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > >
Hi Ramon,
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 20:14 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
>
> On June 9, 2020 8:10:43 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <
> bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > On 2020-06-09 20:07:06 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
> > > Indeed
> > > I'm truly sorry, I thought our crash kernel is
On June 9, 2020 8:10:43 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>On 2020-06-09 20:07:06 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
>> Indeed
>> I'm truly sorry, I thought our crash kernel is configured as RT as
>well.
>> so, as I understand, if I build the RT kernel without preempt enabled
>I can
On 2020-06-09 20:07:06 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
> Indeed
> I'm truly sorry, I thought our crash kernel is configured as RT as well.
> so, as I understand, if I build the RT kernel without preempt enabled I can
> hit this bug?
Don't worry, I should have been better with the details in the
On June 9, 2020 7:42:13 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>On 2020-06-09 19:40:03 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
>> Correction. normal kernel is running with RT enabled, crash kernel
>without.
>
>no RT and no SMP in your crash kernel? So this information in your
>first
>email would
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 18:34 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-06-09 11:17:53 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> > I did find a problem with the patch when configured as !SMP since
> > in
> > that case the RUN flag is never set (will send
On 2020-06-09 19:40:03 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:
> Correction. normal kernel is running with RT enabled, crash kernel without.
no RT and no SMP in your crash kernel? So this information in your first
email would have saved me some time…
Sebastian
On June 9, 2020 7:37:31 PM GMT+03:00, Ramon Fried wrote:
>
>
>On June 9, 2020 7:34:46 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
>>On 2020-06-09 11:17:53 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>Hi Tom,
>>
>>> I did find a problem with the patch when configured as !SMP since in
On June 9, 2020 7:34:46 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
>On 2020-06-09 11:17:53 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>Hi Tom,
>
>> I did find a problem with the patch when configured as !SMP since in
>> that case the RUN flag is never set (will send a patch for that
>>
On 2020-06-09 11:17:53 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Tom,
> I did find a problem with the patch when configured as !SMP since in
> that case the RUN flag is never set (will send a patch for that
> shortly), but that wouldn't be the case here.
How?
| #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) ||
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 17:47 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-06-04 15:51:14 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, This patch introduced a regression in our kernel
> > > (v4.19.124-rt53-rebase), It occurs when we're jumping to crush
> > > kernel
> > > using
On 2020-06-04 15:51:14 [-0500], Tom Zanussi wrote:
> >
> > Hi, This patch introduced a regression in our kernel
> > (v4.19.124-rt53-rebase), It occurs when we're jumping to crush kernel
> > using kexec, in the initialization of the emmc driver.
> > I'm still debugging the root cause, but I
Hi Ramon,
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 19:04 +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:55 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Zhang Xiao
> >
> > v4.19.115-rt49-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ---
> >
> >
> > The kernel bugzilla has
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:55 PM wrote:
>
> From: Zhang Xiao
>
> v4.19.115-rt49-rc1 stable review patch.
> If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ---
>
>
> The kernel bugzilla has the following race condition reported:
>
> CPU0CPU1CPU2
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
