On 16 April 2014 00:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> In tick_do_update_jiffies64() we are processing ticks only if delta is
>> greater
>> than tick_period. This is what we are supposed to do here and it broke a bit
>> with this patch:
>>
>> commit
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> In tick_do_update_jiffies64() we are processing ticks only if delta is greater
> than tick_period. This is what we are supposed to do here and it broke a bit
> with this patch:
>
> commit 47a1b796306356f358e515149d86baf0cc6bf007
> Author: John Stultz
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
In tick_do_update_jiffies64() we are processing ticks only if delta is greater
than tick_period. This is what we are supposed to do here and it broke a bit
with this patch:
commit 47a1b796306356f358e515149d86baf0cc6bf007
Author: John Stultz
On 16 April 2014 00:14, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
In tick_do_update_jiffies64() we are processing ticks only if delta is
greater
than tick_period. This is what we are supposed to do here and it broke a bit
with this patch:
commit
4 matches
Mail list logo