Re: [PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 08:37:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. > > Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling > from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the

Re: [PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 08:37:49 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. > > Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling > from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the

Re: [PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

Daniel Lezcano writes: > The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. > > Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling > from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the current > implementation has some gaps with a

[PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the current implementation has some gaps with a SMP system and a complex cpuidle

[PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the current implementation has some gaps with a SMP system and a complex cpuidle

Re: [PATCH V2] PM / Domains: Remove cpuidle attach

Daniel Lezcano writes: > The power domains code allows to tie a cpuidle state with a power domain. > > Preventing the cpuidle framework to enter a specific idle state by disabling > from the power domain framework is a good idea. Unfortunately, the current >