Re: [PATCH V2] mm, memory_failure: don't send BUS_MCEERR_AO for action required error

2020-05-31 Thread 堀口 直也
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 09:08:43AM +0200, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > Some processes dont't want to be killed early, but in "Action Required" > > case, those also may be killed by BUS_MCEERR_AO when sharing memory > > with other which is accessing the fail memory. > > And sending SIGBUS with

Re: [PATCH V2] mm, memory_failure: don't send BUS_MCEERR_AO for action required error

2020-05-30 Thread Pankaj Gupta
> Some processes dont't want to be killed early, but in "Action Required" > case, those also may be killed by BUS_MCEERR_AO when sharing memory > with other which is accessing the fail memory. > And sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO for action required error is > strange, so ignore the non-current

[PATCH V2] mm, memory_failure: don't send BUS_MCEERR_AO for action required error

2020-05-29 Thread Wetp Zhang
Some processes dont't want to be killed early, but in "Action Required" case, those also may be killed by BUS_MCEERR_AO when sharing memory with other which is accessing the fail memory. And sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO for action required error is strange, so ignore the non-current processes