On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:06:30PM -0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> There are error-prone memcpy() that can be replaced by struct
> assignment that are type-safe and much easier to read. This semantic
> patch looks for memcpy() that can be replaced by struct assignment.
>
> Inspired by
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:06:30PM -0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
There are error-prone memcpy() that can be replaced by struct
assignment that are type-safe and much easier to read. This semantic
patch looks for memcpy() that can be replaced by struct assignment.
Inspired by patches
There are error-prone memcpy() that can be replaced by struct
assignment that are type-safe and much easier to read. This semantic
patch looks for memcpy() that can be replaced by struct assignment.
Inspired by patches sent by Ezequiel Garcia
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin
---
Changes
There are error-prone memcpy() that can be replaced by struct
assignment that are type-safe and much easier to read. This semantic
patch looks for memcpy() that can be replaced by struct assignment.
Inspired by patches sent by Ezequiel Garcia elezegar...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna
4 matches
Mail list logo