On 08/09/2017 14:25, Keerthy wrote:
>
[ ... ]
> This definitely is an issue i have seen on dra7 and if step_wise by
> design can accommodate this change, It will fix the issue!
Ah, ok. I understood you thought we should not do the change and use the
DT crit trip instead.
> Then you should be
On 08/09/2017 14:25, Keerthy wrote:
>
[ ... ]
> This definitely is an issue i have seen on dra7 and if step_wise by
> design can accommodate this change, It will fix the issue!
Ah, ok. I understood you thought we should not do the change and use the
DT crit trip instead.
> Then you should be
On Friday 08 September 2017 05:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:49, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>>> heat
>>> dissipation is not efficient enough
On Friday 08 September 2017 05:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:49, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>>> heat
>>> dissipation is not efficient enough
On 08/09/2017 11:49, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
>> little until reaching
On 08/09/2017 11:49, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
>> little until reaching
On Friday 08 September 2017 03:19 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
>>
On Friday 08 September 2017 03:19 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
>>
On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
> heat
> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
> little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC
On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
> heat
> dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
> little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC
There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the heat
dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC reset.
The behavior is reproducible on a hikey6220 with bad heat
There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the heat
dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC reset.
The behavior is reproducible on a hikey6220 with bad heat
12 matches
Mail list logo
