Re: [PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:17:25 -0800 > > > That seems an odd workflow as it leaves dangling CONFIG_ > > options set, but I guess it doesn't hurt so here it is. > > As you said it's harmless, and more importantly it

Re: [PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread David Miller
From: Joe Perches Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:17:25 -0800 > That seems an odd workflow as it leaves dangling CONFIG_ > options set, but I guess it doesn't hurt so here it is. As you said it's harmless, and more importantly it avoids unnecessary conflicts. > I just removed the modified

[PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
Remove wanrouter as it's obsolete and has not been updated by sangoma since 2.4.3 or so and it's not used anymore. Remove obsolete cyclomx drivers. Update files that include now deleted wanrouter bits. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:44 -0500, David Miller wrote: >

[PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
Remove wanrouter as it's obsolete and has not been updated by sangoma since 2.4.3 or so and it's not used anymore. Remove obsolete cyclomx drivers. Update files that include now deleted wanrouter bits. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com --- On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:44 -0500, David

Re: [PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread David Miller
From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:17:25 -0800 That seems an odd workflow as it leaves dangling CONFIG_foo options set, but I guess it doesn't hurt so here it is. As you said it's harmless, and more importantly it avoids unnecessary conflicts. I just removed the

Re: [PATCH V2] wanrouter: Remove it and the drivers that depend on it

2012-11-13 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 17:17 -0500, David Miller wrote: From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:17:25 -0800 That seems an odd workflow as it leaves dangling CONFIG_foo options set, but I guess it doesn't hurt so here it is. As you said it's harmless, and more