On 12/10/15 18:51, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 07:55 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
On 12/10/15 18:51, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 07:55 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
On 10/12/2015 07:55 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
way, however, I can
On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
way, however, I can
On 10/12/2015 07:55 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 09/10/15 16:26, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
way, however, I can see that given that the name indicates rx or tx,
then the
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
>> That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
>> way, however, I can see that given that the name indicates rx or tx,
>> then the direction in the binding could be seen as
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
>> That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
>> way, however, I can see that given that the name indicates rx or tx,
>> then the direction in the binding could be seen as
On 10/09/2015 04:20 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 08/10/15 15:27, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[snip]
That's fine. From my perspective I don't have a strong objection either
way, however, I can see that given that the name indicates rx or tx,
then the
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 20:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter
On 07/10/15 20:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add
On 07/10/15 20:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add
On 10/08/2015 03:58 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 20:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter
On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:43:45AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
> >> controller.
> >
> >> diff --git
[...]
> >+- dma-channels: Must be 22. Defines the number of DMA channels
> >supported
> >+ by the DMA controller.
>
> If this has to be a fixed value, why is it necessary? Why does the
> driver not just know this?
>
> Are there other instances of this IP block
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
>>>
diff --git
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
On 10/07/2015 09:26 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 06/10/15 23:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
On 06/10/15 23:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
>> controller.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
>>
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
>> controller.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
>>
On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
On 06/10/15 23:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
On 10/07/2015 09:26 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 06/10/15 23:57, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
On 07/10/15 17:09, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 02:43 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
>>>
diff --git
[...]
> >+- dma-channels: Must be 22. Defines the number of DMA channels
> >supported
> >+ by the DMA controller.
>
> If this has to be a fixed value, why is it necessary? Why does the
> driver not just know this?
>
> Are there other instances of this IP block
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:43:45AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 07/10/15 00:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
> >> controller.
> >
> >> diff --git
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
+- #dma-cells : Must be <2>. The first cell
On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
---
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
>> controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt | 63
>>
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
>> controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
On 10/06/2015 03:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 05/10/15 14:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
---
On 10/05/2015 06:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
+- #dma-cells : Must be <2>. The first cell
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt | 63
> ++
> 1 file changed, 63
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
---
.../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt | 63 ++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt | 63
> ++
> 1 file
Add device-tree binding documentation for the Tegra210 Audio DMA
controller.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter
---
.../devicetree/bindings/dma/tegra210-adma.txt | 63 ++
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
40 matches
Mail list logo