On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:46:24AM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel
>
> The device tree property should be more descriptive.
> microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
> prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
> Users of mcp have to switch to the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:46:24AM +0100, Lars Poeschel wrote:
From: Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de
The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch
From: Lars Poeschel
The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch to the microchip prefix.
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel
---
From: Lars Poeschel poesc...@lemonage.de
The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch to the microchip prefix.
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel
4 matches
Mail list logo