On 27 March 2014 11:10, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> What if this is a spurious interrupt and active_bases is 0?
Hmm.. haven't thought about that actually.. I thought it would be
guaranteed here that active_bases isn't zero.
Will fix it as the current code would end up in a infinite loop.
--
To unsu
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Currently we are iterating over all possible (currently four) bits of
> active_bases to see if corresponding clock bases are active. This is good
> enough
> for cases where 3 or 4 bases are used but if only 1 or 2 are used then it
> makes
> more sense t
Currently we are iterating over all possible (currently four) bits of
active_bases to see if corresponding clock bases are active. This is good enough
for cases where 3 or 4 bases are used but if only 1 or 2 are used then it makes
more sense to use __ffs() to find the right bit directly.
Suggested
3 matches
Mail list logo
